Methods for constructing virtual laboratories

DOI: 10.31673/2412-4338.2019.038389

Authors

  • О. А. Золотухіна, (Zolotukhina O. A.) State University of Telecommunications, Kyiv
  • А. П. Бондарчук, (Bondarchuk A. P.) State University of Telecommunications, Kyiv
  • К. П. Сторчак, (Storchak K. P.) State University of Telecommunications, Kyiv
  • О. В. Негоденко, (Nehodenko O. V.) State University of Telecommunications, Kyiv
  • А. М. Штіммерман, (Shtimmerman A. M.) State University of Telecommunications, Kyiv
  • С. Ю. Резнік, (Reznik S. Yu.) State University of Telecommunications, Kyiv

Abstract

The paper analyzes thethe methods of representing, storing, transmitting and processing virtual lab data and architecture . The features of virtualization of educational tasks are considered. Key requirements for the virtual lab were prioritized using the MoSCoW technique. The proposed approaches to determining the key characteristics of a virtual laboratory do not depend on the subject area for which the laboratory is being developed. The methods of analyzing the content and methods of presenting the results of educational activities allow not only to evaluate the amount of work to create a virtual laboratory, but also to determine the composition of the team to justify the involvement of various specialists.

Keywords: virtual lab, static elements, dynamic elements, content, user activity results, domain, key requirements.

References
1. Zotou Elissavet. (2018). “Innovative education: Virtual labs.” Open Schools Journal for Open Science. 1. 9. 10.12681/osj.17377.
2. Alves Paulo, L. Miranda, and Morais Carlos. (2017). “The Influence of Virtual Learning Environments in Students' Performance.” Universal Journal of Educational Research. 5. 517-527. 10.13189/ujer.2017.050325.
3. Ortega M.C.G., and Falconer L. (2015) “Learning spaces in virtual world: bringing our distance students home”, Journa; of Applied Research in Higher Education, Vol. 7(1): 83- 98. Print.
4. Cecilia Chan. “Wilton Fok. Engineering Education.” Journal of the Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre, Vol. 4, 2 (2009). Print.
5. Duarte, M., Butz, B.P., Miller, S.M., and Mahalingam, A. "An Intelligent Universal Virtual Laboratory (UVL)", Education, IEEE Transactions, vol.51, no.1 (Feb. 2008): 2-9. Print.
6. Dhang Sukriti, Jana Pabitra and Mandal Chittaranjan. “Virtual Laboratory for Basic Electronics.” Journal of engineering, science and management education. 10 (2018): 67. Print.
7. Kopishev E., and Syzdykov A. “Virtual chemistry laboratories for the undergraduate students of Kazakhstan.” (2018): 226-234. Print.
8. Gromova Ekaterina and Fedorova Olesia. “Engineering distance learning course support on the Moodle platform.” Energy Safety and Energy Economy (2019): 51-54. Print. 10.18635/2071-2219-2019-3-51-54.
9. Prieto-Blazquez J. Garcia-Tora I. Herrera-Joancomarti J., and Guerrero-Roldan A.-E., "Virtual Laboratory ontology for engineering education", Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008. FIE 2008. 38th Annual (Oct. 2008): S2F-1-S2F-6, 22-25. Print.
10. Hudaib Amjad, Masadeh Raja Haj, Qasem Mais, and Alzaqebah Abdullah. “Requirements Prioritization Techniques Comparison.” Modern Applied Science, v12., 2 (2018): 62.12. 10.5539/mas. Print.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-18

Issue

No. 3 (2019)

Section

Articles