DISTANCE LEARNING: ANALYSIS OF CONCEPTS, FORMATS, PLATFORMS, ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

DOI: 10.31673/2412-4338.2023.047383

Abstract

Formulation of the problem in general. The article analyzes the peculiarities of integrating distance learning into the educational process of higher military educational institutions and military educational units of higher education institutions under martial law in Ukraine. In modern conditions, higher education necessitates the use of distance learning, which allows for the acquisition of knowledge without interrupting professional duties. The purpose of this article is to analyze the concepts of “distance education”, “distance learning”, “blended learnin”, to conduct a comparative analysis of synchronous and asynchronous formats in the context of blended learning, to consider popular distance learning platforms (systems), and to identify the advantages and disadvantages of distance learning. In writing the article, a multidimensional approach was used to collect, analyze and summarize information on the integration of distance learning into military education. The following research methods were used: comparative analysis; technological assessment; survey. The combination of these research methods allowed us to get a holistic view of the subject, challenges and opportunities offered by the introduction of distance learning in military education. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Despite the numerous scientific works devoted to this issue, the practical application of innovative forms and methods of teaching in the field of military education is somewhat limited. Further research and exploration is needed to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, thus advancing military education in the digital age and at the same time responding to the unique challenges and requirements of this specialized field. Therefore, researching and identifying the features related to the integration of distance learning into the educational process of higher military educational institutions and military educational units of higher education institutions is an important scientific task. Presenting the main material. The article analyzes the concepts of “distance education”, “distance learning” and “blended learning”. It is found that distance education is a purposeful pedagogical exchange between participants of the educational process, which organically combines traditional and distance learning forms. This combination can take place within a physical classroom or go beyond it, using synchronous and asynchronous formats supported by a wide range of information and communication technologies. Elements of scientific novelty. A comparative analysis of synchronous and asynchronous formats in the context of blended learning is carried out, and the distinctive features of each of them are highlighted. Synchronous learning provides quick feedback between teachers and students, promotes joint group activities, develops communication skills, and triggers intrinsic motivation through interactive discourse. Conversely, the asynchronous format provides for schedule flexibility, which allows students to determine their own pace of learning, ensures the availability of educational resources at a convenient time, and develops self-organization skills. It has been found that distance learning is a purposeful pedagogical exchange between participants in the educational process that combines traditional and distance learning. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of distance learning are identified. Advantages: individual pace of learning; the ability to choose areas of development; the ability to revise the educational material; mitigation of mental and physical stress and development of autodidactic competencies. Disadvantages: limited direct social interaction; increased technological impact on everyday life and limited practical hours devoted to skill acquisition. Practical significance of the article. At the National Defense University of Ukraine, popular distance learning platforms and systems such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Classroom, and Google Meet have become indispensable tools for providing educational services. In addition, this study emphasizes the key role that modern digital technologies play in shaping the training of military professionals. These technologies are a fundamental prerequisite for success in education, constantly evolving and defining the contours of pedagogical paradigms, especially in the field of distance learning. Conclusion and the perspectives of future researches. Information and Communication Technologies are an aid to learning, but they cannot replace live communication. A promising area for further research is the study of technologies for organizing distance and blended learning in higher education institutions.

Keywords: distance education, distance learning, mixed learning, synchronous format, asynchronous format, information and telecommunication technologies.

References
1. On the approval of the Distance Learning Concept in the Armed Forces of Ukraine: Order of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine dated 12/21/2015 No. 744. URL: https://www.mil.gov.ua/content/mou_orders/mou_2020/nmou_744_21122015.pdf
2. Bezuidenhout A. Analyzing the Importance-Competence Gap of Distance Educators With the Increased Utilization of Online Learning Strategies in a Developing World Context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2018. No. 19 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3585.
3. Cloud technologies in education / ed.: V. Yu. Bykov et al. kind. from. KMI, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31812/0564/590.
4. Bondarenko T. Analysis of digital tools for creating multimedia content in the conditions of distance learning in higher education. Science and perspective. 2022. No. 9 (16). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2695-1592-2022-9(16)-423-431.
5. Bogachkov Y. M., Bukach A. V., Uhan P. S. Complex application of google classroom for creating variable distance courses. Information Technologies and Learning Tools. 2020. No. 76 (2). P. 290–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v76i2.3338.
6. Schuwer R., Gil Jaurena I., Aydin C.H., Costello E., Dalsgaard C., Brown M., Teixeira A. Opportunities and Threats of the MOOC Movement for Higher Education: The European Perspective. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2015. No. 16 (6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2153.
7. Sánchez-Elvira Paniagua, A. and Simpson, O. Developing student support for open and distance learning: The empower Project. journal of interactive media in education. 2018. No. 1. DOI: 10.5334/jime.470.
8. Da Costa F. R., S. Pelissari A., V. D. P. Gonzalez I. Corporate Image of Public Higher Education Institutions: Relevant Factors to Distance Learning Students. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 2018. No. 19 (1). P. 117–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.382738.
9. Bykov V. Y., Shyshkina M. P. Conceptual foundations of the formation and development of a cloud-oriented educational and scientific environment of the university in the context of the priorities of open science. Information technologies and teaching aids. 2018. No. 68 (6). P. 1‒19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v68i6.2609.
10. Babak O., Isak L. Cloud technologies in education. Grail of Science. 2023. No. 27. P. 486–490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.12.05.2023.079.
11. Silenko A. O., Kruk N. V. Distance education: Alternative or additional possibilities of traditional education?. Actual problems of politics. 2022. No. 69. P. 94–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32837/app.v0i69.1308.
12. Kuharenko V. Competition of distance courses. Modern information technologies and innovative teaching methods in the professional training of specialists, methodology, theory, experience, problems. 2022. P. 69–80. DOI: 10.31652/2412-1142-2021-60-69-80.
13. Pryshchepa T. V., Pryshchepa O. A., Kravets S. G., Kravets O. A., Kravets A. A., Kravets Yu. A. Research of modern approaches to the organization of distance education. Scientific journal of the National Pedagogical University named after M. P. Drahomanov. 2017. No. 22(29). P. 3–12.
14. Rodinova N., Chervoniy M., Diorditsa I. Peculiarities of distance learning of students in the conditions of martial law. Perspectives and innovations of science. 2022. No. 4(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/10.04.2020.v1.01.
15. Kuharenko V. M., Bondarenko V. V. Emergency distance learning in Ukraine: monograph. Kharkiv: City Printing House, 2020. 409 p. URL: monograph_ekstr_dyst_navch.pdf.
16. On higher education: Law of Ukraine dated July 1, 2014 No. 1556-VII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18#Text.
17. On the approval of the Regulation on distance learning: Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine dated 04/25/2013 No. 466. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0703-13#n18.
18. Yu. V. Tryus, I. V. Gerasimenko. Combined learning as an innovative educational technology in higher education. Theory and methodology of e-learning: collection. of science works Issue III. Kryvyi Rih, 2012. P. 299–308.
19. Sobchenko T. Blended learning: concepts and tasks. Pedagogy of creative personality formation in higher and secondary schools. 2021. No. 3 (75). P. 73–76. DOI.org/10.32840/1992-5786.2021.75-3.14
20. Christensen C. M., Horn M. B., Staker H. Blended: using disruptive innovation to improve schools. Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, John, 2014. 336 p.
21. Silenko A.O., Kruk N.V. Distance education: an alternative or additional possibilities of traditional education? Actual problems of politics. 2022. No. 69. P. 94–100. DOI: 10.32837/app.v0i69.1308.
22. Osadchiy V.V. University distance learning system. Scientific Bulletin of the Melitopol State Pedagogical University. No. 5. 2010. P. 7–16.
23. Havrylenko K. M. New challenges of distance learning. Collection of scientific works of pedagogical sciences. 2021. No. 93. P. 133–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2413-1865/2020-93-20.
24. Sayenko N. S., Havrylenko K. M. Distance learning technologies in the virtual educational space of a modern university. Bulletin of Zaporizhzhya National University of Pedagogical Sciences. 2021. No. 1 (3). P. 221–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26661/2522-4360-2020-3-1-33.