DISTRIBUTION OF USER ROLES IN THE RATING SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION EMPLOYEES

DOI: 10.31673/2412-4338.2024.019901

Abstract

The article examines in detail the role ranking model in the rating system of scientific and pedagogical workers, which is an important problem in modern higher education and scientific institutions. The key aspects of this model are singled out, in particular, the mechanisms of data collection and analysis, options for using assessment results, as well as methods of forming a reputational component of scientific and pedagogical workers.
Special attention is paid to the potential advantages of using this model in the practice of administrative management and in the formation of reputations. The possibility of using the obtained results for making strategic decisions, as well as for stimulating self-development and improving the professional skills of scientific and pedagogical workers, is being investigated.
An important factor when using rating data in reports or when making decisions is the reliability of information, which requires the availability of data verification mechanisms or the most important part of them (in the case of large volumes or the complexity/duration of the verification procedure), as well as the possibility of accepting or rejecting individual indicators with comments by authorized individuals (for example, department heads).
It is noted that the implementation of the role ranking model can be an important step in the direction of increasing objectivity and transparency in the evaluation of employees, which, in turn, will contribute to the improvement of the quality of education and research activities. At the same time, it is important to take into account potential limitations and challenges that may arise in the process of implementing this model, such as the ambiguity of evaluation criteria, the difficulty of collecting and analyzing a large amount of data, as well as the possibility of conflicts of interest among process participants.
Taking into account all these aspects, the role ranking model can become an effective tool for increasing the efficiency of management and stimulating the professional growth of scientific and pedagogical workers, which will contribute to the further development of education and science in general.

Key words: rating, scientific and pedagogical workers, ranking of roles, diagram of distribution of roles, diagram of precedents.

References
1. Approval of the Licensing Conditions for Educational Activities: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated December 30, 2015, No. 1187: as of June 20, 2021. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1187–2015-п#Text.
2. Approval of the Procedure for Conducting Competitive Selection or Appointment by Competition for the Filling of Vacant Positions of Academic Staff and the Conclusion of Employment Contracts (Contracts): Order of Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute dated September 24, 2021, No. НУ/201/2021. URL: https://osvita.kpi.ua/sites/default/files/downloads/Наказ_№НУ_201_2021_від_24_09_2021.pdf .
3. Approval of the Regulation on the Quality Assurance System of Higher Education at the National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute": Order of Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute dated September 10, 2020, No. 7/165. URL: link (accessed: January 7, 2024).
4. Miach D. O. Subsystem "Subsystem "Rating of scientific and pedagogical workers" of the automated information system "Electronic campus": individual research project… bachelor: 126 Information Systems and Technologies / Miach Dmytro Oleksandrovych. — Kyiv, 2022. — 64 p. URL: https://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/57792.
5. Approval of the Regulation on the Ranking of Academic Staff of Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute: Order dated July 15, 2021, No. NON/196/2021.
6. Standards for the Performance Evaluation of Academic Staff: Standards dated February 27, 2020. URL: https://osvita.kpi.ua/sites/default/files/downloads/Норми%20бального%20оцінюв ання%20Рейтинг%20НПП%202020–1.pdf.